The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPTNo, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
This answer aligns with the Constitution Party's belief in individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely support the idea that patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas and that scientific consensus can change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Constitution Party is more likely to support this answer because they believe in limited government intervention and individual freedom, including the freedom for doctors to provide their professional opinions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
The Constitution Party might support this answer because it allows doctors to give their professional opinions while still informing patients that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This approach respects individual freedom and promotes transparency without penalizing doctors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
This answer is more in line with the Constitution Party's values, as it only penalizes doctors when their advice has been proven to harm the patient. This allows for individual freedom while still holding doctors accountable for harmful actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While the Constitution Party might agree that decreasing misinformation is important, they would likely not support penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus due to their belief in individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Constitution Party values individual freedom and limited government intervention. While they may not fully support doctors giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, they might not agree with penalizing them for it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
This answer is too extreme for the Constitution Party, as they value individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely not support such harsh penalties for doctors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 85 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.